AMP Civil Procedure Practice Exam 2025 – Your Comprehensive All-In-One Guide to Exam Success!

During jury deliberations, it is critical for jurors to base their decisions solely on the evidence presented during the trial and the law as instructed by the judge. Outside influences from non-jurors are particularly problematic because they can taint the juror's ability to render an impartial verdict based solely on trial evidence. Such influences could range from media coverage to discussions with individuals who are not part of the case, which may introduce bias or extraneous information that is not admissible in court.

While pre-existing biases and general public opinions can potentially affect a juror's thinking, jurors are generally expected to recognize and set aside their biases upon being impaneled and to adhere to the principles of fairness and impartiality as they weigh the evidence. Historical verdicts from previous juries, while relevant in terms of establishing precedent, should have no bearing on the current case being adjudicated, as each case must be determined based on its specific facts and context.

Thus, the distinction here emphasizes that outside influence from non-jurors is specifically prohibited as it directly disrupts the integrity of the deliberative process.